An Unplanned Purchase

Sounds dubious, doesn’t it?

I was up in the northern suburbs yesterday, visiting my grandfather (who was in hospital), and during the window during which visitors weren’t allowed, we went over to the shopping centre for lunch and window-shopping.

As we went past the pet shop, I sort of glanced at the windows, just saw dogs, and continued on. My sister, however, wanted to make absolutely certain that there weren’t any cats there, and went further inside. “Rachel!” she called out, “There are chickens!”

“Really?” It’s a very urban area. And, well, you don’t have chickens in pet shops.

But, sure enough, three little chicks. Frizzles, about eight weeks old if I was any judge (which I am), one cockerel and two pullets. Further investigation showed they were signed “Frizzle X, Unsexed, 2 for $15 or 3 for $20”.

Very excited, but a niggling voice in the back of my mind telling me I was doing something hasty that I’d regret, I went and asked the assistant if I could have a closer look. There was some disagreement about what “a closer look” meant: I wanted to pick them up and check feet, wings, and necks; she didn’t want them picked up because they got panicky. In the end, I was allowed to stick my head and upper body inside the case and pick them up to look.

Small Chicks 03

This photo was taken at home. Discerning chook-keeping readers will recognise the buff one on the right as the cockerel. The shop assistant said that they were Silkie-crosses, and the two pullets have vestigial Silkie toes (Silkies, for some reason, have five toes, rather than the usual four), but the cockerel doesn’t, so I suspect that the two pullets are 1/4 Silkie and the cockerel is a full Frizzle. I’ve had first-generation Sizzles before and they had Silkie top-knots, which none of these do.

The pet shop said they didn’t sell them individually, so it was three or nothing and I reluctantly added the cockerel to the mix – I had been planning just to buy the two pullets (one of the advantages of being familiar enough with poultry to sex chickens from about six weeks, which is an age they’re still being sold as ‘unsexed’).

I was still sort of thinking, as I walked through the shopping centre with a cheeping box, that I might regret the purchase – I’m not usually one for rash purchases, particularly involving livestock. However, the more I thought about it, the more pleased I was with the purchase.

For starters, I didn’t breed this past spring because my gene pool was getting a bit inbred. So I knew I’d have to get some more birds – preferably a rooster of some pretty-looking breed – ready to be about 6 months old in Spring. I’ve half-heartedly looking on Gumtree once or twice, to no avail – boring roosters are free, fancy ones get expensive, and never mind the hens.

For a Frizzle, Silkie, or Sizzle, you can expect to pay $15-20 each on Gumtree for birds this age, probably more for a pullet.

And the breed – one of my favourites to get a bit of into my flock, blood which I don’t currently have in the mix – aside, at 7 weeks old now [we asked], they’ll be coming into lay in October-November, just in time for the breeding season. I’ve got about half a dozen bantam-cross pullets that can be put in the breeding pen with these three – and I think the two pullets are sisters, but the cockerel is more distantly related, based on his breed. So, basically, these birds are perfect in every way.

Small Chicks 01

They’ve been named. From left to right, it’s Roy [or Ruadh], Dorcha and Nora (Gaelic-speakers will get the joke for those first two). We’ll see if these names stick. For the most part, only our roosters have names – currently, we have George, Albert, Douglas, Harry, and another one I don’t think has a name and is only still alive because he masqueraded as a girl when I was sorting them.

You can tell they haven’t been handled much as they’re not very friendly, so they’re in for a lot of handling over the next few weeks to tame them – especially Roy, as it’s important to have a friendly rooster. (Albert, for example, is nasty, and picks even on his father, dear sweet George).


Film: A’ Seinn an Aghaidh na Balbhachd

Title: A’ Seinn an Aghaidh na Balbhachd: Gàidheil na h-Albann Nuaidhe
.                  (Singing Against the Silence: Gaels in Nova Scotia)

About: A brief look at the history of Gaels in Nova Scotia, a discussion of the decrease of the language and interviews with Gaels (Gaelic-speakers) of all ages and language-related activities in Nova Scotia today.

Language: Gaelic

Subtitles: English

Year: 2012

Time: 26 minutes

One Path to God’s End

Last week at a Bible Study, the topic came up of followers of other religions and whether they can have salvation or not. The general consensus of most of the others in the group seemed to be that yes, they could, because all religions are different means to the same end, and they are finding their own path, and “actually, I get on quite well with my Muslim friends”, and we all just have different ways of seeing God, even those who don’t concede He exists.

Well, regular readers of my blog will know that I firstly disagree with that and secondly wasn’t having a bar of it.

Placing my Bible down on the table, folding my hands on top of it, and leaning forwards, I said, “May I quote, ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life; no-one comes to the Father except through me’?”

(If there’s anyone who doesn’t know – and I wouldn’t have thought there were any Christians who didn’t, until I was stopped by one of the ladies at the Bible study who questioned me on all of the following in genuine ignorance – yes, that’s a quote from the Bible [John 14:6]; I is Jesus speaking; and the Father is God the Father.)

So you don’t think followers of other religions can be saved?”

And I didn’t answer well. I stumbled and mumbled and missed out important things – which is why I’m rectifying it and straightening my thoughts out by writing this down now.

“Well, I accept that Jews can be saved.” Definitely pre-Messiah (pre-Jesus) Jews… I’m not sure one way or the other about Jews today. “But as for other religions… if you believe and hundreds of gods or spirits, or no God… then no.”

On the topic of Muslims, I’ll just add here… I’m open to the thought that they might worship with same God. Or rather, that they might worship the same God misrepresented. That is to say, I do believe they worship God, but I don’t believe they worship my God. I think they believe they’re worshipping my God.

Does that make sense? I don’t believe Allah is some other being, or the devil, or the antichrist. I can see enough similarity in the teachings of Islam to Christianity that it’s a bit of a sort of messed-up version of it. All the basics are there. All the histories are the same. The basic message has been changed. So, no, their God is the same God as the God of the Jews and the Christians. However, is Allah perhaps an idol – a man-made idea – of the worst kind? Is he a man-made god which bears enough similarity to the real thing to be mistaken as such?

Yes, I know that’s controversial. But that’s just a little to explain my thinking on the matter. Jews definitely worship the same God as Christians. Sometimes perhaps they don’t understand Him the same way, but more than ¾ of the Christian Scriptures are the Jewish Scriptures, so we worship the same God.

But, on the matter of the potential salvation of followers of other religions through that religion, as far as I can see it:

Jews – Maybe. Definitely in the past, perhaps today; at any rate, they have enough information within their own faith for salvation through Christ.

Muslims – Not really. Close, but not quite there, which is the saddest thing about it all.

Others – No.

But what about people who never have the chance to hear about Jesus?”

This is the tricky question people always throw at you when you start talking about salvation through Christ alone. After all, salvation through Christ alone inherently implies condemnation for everyone else, so doesn’t it seem unfair that people can be condemned without ever hearing?

I know what my lecturers would say. They would point out that everyone in the world is descended from Noah, and therefore every people group in the world at some point knew God and rejected him. They would bring up Romans 1 and natural revelation. They would mention the Old Testament and how the consequences of rejection of God is passed down through the generations, and not limited to just the one who rejects him.

It’s a hard thing to say, because all those things imply that such people who never have a chance to hear about Jesus are condemned by their ancestors, and by circumstances outside their control, and we don’t want our God to be like that. God, after all, is love.

But He is also just, and sometimes God’s justice seems cruel to us.

But… but… Romans 1 and natural revelation. God works in mysterious ways. There are only a handful of truly uncontacted peoples today, although there are definitely a larger number who will never have contact with Christians. But God’s creation is the same everywhere, and wondrous, and said uncontacted tribes usually have a very keen awareness of the spiritual, in one form or another. God’s natural revelation can lead people to question, to look further, to look for God. God is powerful. Who am I to say what He can and can’t do?

So, awful as it sounds, those uncontacted tribes are not my concern – unless, of course, God calls me to minister to them. Even the much larger number of people in the world who will never meet a Christian are not – at this point in my life – my concern. What is my concern, however, are the people I interact with on a daily basis who follow other religions – or no religion at all.

What the people in the Bible Study group would have me do is make friends with these people, accepting that we’re just on different paths to the same goal, and leave it at that.

But the moment we do that, we’re denying Christ.

Does that sound harsh? Probably. But if we sincerely believe that we have been saved through Christ, then in those very same passages, we must also accept that the only way to salvation is through Christ. Surely we should want to go out and let everyone know, so they can join us? “Go and make disciples, baptising in the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.” To tell ourselves that followers of other religions are on their way to salvation by a different path is to not only deny our own salvation, but to deny Christ and some of His last words to us – the Great Commission.

There are people right here with us, whom see every day, with whom we work, who might be counted among the ‘people who never have the chance to hear about Jesus’ if we as Christians do not speak up and tell them! And the awful things is, they will have had the chance, but we will have denied it to them because we’re telling ourselves “we all have different paths to God”.

Now, I don’t want to you think I’m some raving lunatic who goes out every day street-preaching and basically making a nuisance of myself to my non-Christian colleagues. We all know (well, most of us) that that sort of thing isn’t a constructive way to go about sharing the Gospel. And besides that, I’m much too chicken.

So I have friends of other religions. I have “neo-spiritual” hippy friends (there are a lot of them in my area). I have friends who are atheist, postmodernist, “normal twenty-first-century rational” people.

But at no point do I forget that they are lost – unsaved – and at no point do I tell myself, “Oh, that’s all right, because we’re all on different roads to the same place in the end.”

No, but you have to pick your moments carefully. I’m more outspoken on these matters among Christians than among non-Christians, and definitely much more outspoken on my blog! Traditional ways of “sharing the Gospel” don’t always work, particularly on postmodernists and hippies.

What does work, however, is showing them that you’re normal, “living out Christ in your life” (in quotes because I hate that phrase as ridiculous Christianese, but have to concede it fits), and answering their questions when they arise.

What does work, with hippies particularly, is finding points of commonality. Hippies are open to faith and to God. They’re not open to religion. Share your faith and your lifestyle, comment on something wonderfully spiritual they’ve “discovered” which is actually a much-cherished part of Christianity. (Laying of hands in prayer, for example, is a big one I’ve discussed with hippies on at least two occasions).

Reach out at share with your non-Christian friends however you will, however it works, but do not – for one moment – forget that they need you to reach out and share with them.

Don’t deny your own salvation, Christ and the Great Commission, by jumping on the happy bandwagon that “all religions are different means to the same end”.

They’re not.


Feel free to flame me in the comments.

But remember my blog’s policy on the airing of alternate views: you may take up to two comments to express your view in a calm, inoffensive manner, after which we will agree to disagree. No name-calling or accusations of narrow-mindedness, any-isms or brainwashing.